Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine Practice Questions

Q: A 13-year-old boy attends the surgery with a sore throat. Legally, what must a general practitioner do?

Examine and prescribe as appropriate. ### Explanation **Correct Option: A (Examine and prescribe as appropriate)** The core concept here is **Gillick Competence**. In medical jurisprudence, a minor (under 18 years) can provide valid consent for medical examination and treatment if they possess sufficient intelligence and maturity to understand the nature and consequences of the proposed treatment. For a minor ailment like a sore throat, a 13-year-old is generally considered capable of consenting to a non-invasive examination and standard treatment. The doctor’s primary duty is to act in the patient's best interest while respecting their emerging autonomy. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Option B:** Refusing to see the patient could lead to a charge of **negligence** or abandonment, especially if the condition is urgent. While involving a parent is ideal, it is not a legal prerequisite for minor ailments. * **Option C:** This causes unnecessary delay in treatment. If the child is competent to consent, the doctor can proceed without parental presence. * **Option D:** Examination and prescription are both parts of medical management. If the child is competent to consent to an exam, they are generally competent to consent to the resulting treatment for a minor condition. **Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Gillick Competence:** Originates from the UK (Gillick v West Norfolk) but is globally recognized. It applies to children under 16 who show sufficient understanding. * **Fraser Guidelines:** Specifically relate to providing contraceptive advice or treatment to minors without parental consent. * **Indian Context (Section 89 IPC):** Consent given by a guardian is valid for children under 12. However, for older children (12–18), their own "assent" is ethically and legally significant for routine procedures. * **Emergency Rule:** In a life-threatening emergency, a doctor can treat a minor without any consent (Doctrine of Necessity).

Q: The doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur means?

The facts speak for themselves. **Explanation:** **Res Ipsa Loquitur** is a Latin maxim meaning **"the facts speak for themselves."** In medical negligence cases, it is a rule of evidence that allows the court to infer negligence without detailed proof of a breach of duty, because the nature of the accident is such that it would not have occurred without negligence. **Why Option A is Correct:** For this doctrine to apply, three conditions must be met: 1. The event does not normally occur in the absence of negligence. 2. The "instrumentality" causing the harm was under the exclusive control of the doctor/hospital. 3. There was no contributory negligence by the patient. *Example:* A surgical sponge left inside a patient’s abdomen after surgery. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **Option B (Respondeat Superior):** Means "Let the master answer." This refers to **Vicarious Liability**, where an employer (hospital/senior consultant) is held responsible for the negligent acts of their employees (nurses/residents) committed during their employment. * **Option C (Res Judicata):** Means "The things have been decided." It is a legal principle preventing the same case from being litigated twice between the same parties once a final judgment has been reached. * **Option D (Avoidable Consequences):** A doctrine stating that a plaintiff cannot recover damages for harm that could have been avoided by reasonable effort or expenditure after the injury occurred. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Burden of Proof:** Usually, the burden of proof lies with the patient (plaintiff). However, in cases of *Res Ipsa Loquitur*, the **burden of proof shifts to the doctor** to prove they were not negligent. * **Common Examples:** Operating on the wrong limb, blood transfusion reactions due to mismatched grouping, or leaving instruments inside body cavities.

Q: Protecting an unqualified person in medical practice by a registered medical practitioner is known as which of the following?

Covering. ### Explanation **Correct Answer: B. Covering** **Concept Overview:** In medical jurisprudence, **Covering** refers to the unethical practice where a registered medical practitioner (RMP) uses their professional status or qualifications to protect, assist, or enable an unqualified person (quack) to practice medicine. This includes signing certificates, prescriptions, or legal documents for patients they have not personally treated, effectively "covering" the illegal practice of the unqualified individual. This is considered **Professional Misconduct** (Infamous Conduct) under the National Medical Commission (NMC) guidelines and can lead to the removal of the doctor's name from the Medical Register. **Analysis of Incorrect Options:** * **A. Uncoverage:** This is a distractor term and does not exist in the context of medical ethics or jurisprudence. * **C. Touting:** This refers to the practice of procuring patients for a doctor through agents or "touts" who are paid a commission. It is a form of unethical self-advertisement. * **D. Dichotomy:** Also known as **Fee-splitting**, this occurs when a practitioner shares a portion of their fee with another doctor (usually a referring GP or consultant) for referring a patient. It is strictly prohibited. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **Infamous Conduct:** Any act by a doctor which would be reasonably regarded as disgraceful or dishonorable by their professional brethren of good repute. * **The "6 A’s" of Professional Misconduct:** Adultery (with a patient), Association (with unqualified persons/Covering), Alcoholism (while on duty), Advertising, Abortion (illegal), and Addiction. * **Disciplinary Action:** The State Medical Council has the power to award punishment, ranging from a warning to **Erasure** (temporary or permanent removal) of the doctor's name from the register, often called the "Professional Death Sentence."

Q: Which of the following constitutes professional misconduct?

All of the above. **Explanation:** Professional misconduct (also known as **Infamous Conduct**) refers to any act by a medical practitioner that is considered disgraceful or dishonorable by their professional brethren of good repute and competency. In India, these are governed by the **National Medical Commission (NMC)**, formerly the Medical Council of India (MCI), under the "Code of Ethics and Etiquette." **Analysis of Options:** * **Association with non-medical persons (Option A):** A registered medical practitioner must not employ or assist any unqualified person (quacks) to perform medical procedures or treat patients. This is often referred to as "covering." * **Dichotomy (Option B):** Also known as **Fee-splitting**. This involves a practitioner sharing a portion of their fee with another doctor or person for referring a patient. It is strictly prohibited as it compromises patient care for financial gain. * **Issuing false certificates (Option C):** Doctors are legally bound to be truthful. Signing or issuing a medical certificate (e.g., birth, death, or sickness certificates) that is known to be false or misleading is a serious act of misconduct. Since all three actions violate the ethical code and can lead to disciplinary action (including the removal of the doctor’s name from the medical register), **Option D** is correct. **High-Yield Clinical Pearls for NEET-PG:** * **The 6 A’s of Misconduct:** Remember these for quick recall: **A**dultery (with a patient), **A**bortion (illegal), **A**ssociation (with quacks), **A**ddiction (to drugs/alcohol while on duty), **A**dvertising, and **A**dulteration (of drugs). * **Punishment:** The disciplinary body (State Medical Council) can award "Professional Death Sentence," which refers to the **permanent erasure** of the doctor's name from the Medical Register. * **Euthanasia:** Performing active euthanasia is considered professional misconduct in India.

Question 1

Supreme Court guidelines regarding criminal negligence by a doctor include all of the following EXCEPT:

Accepted Answer

Must be arrested immediately.

Answer

Complaint against the doctor must have prima facie evidence.

Answer

Must obtain an independent opinion from a government doctor.

Answer

Must have prima facie evidence from a competent doctor.

Question 2

Professional secrecy is defined as:

Accepted Answer

An implied term of the contract between a doctor and patient

Answer

A legal responsibility

Answer

An ethical responsibility

Answer

A social responsibility

Question 3

A patient with a head injury requires urgent cranial decompression but has no relatives available. What should the doctor do?

Accepted Answer

Operate without formal consent

Answer

Obtain consent from the police

Answer

Wait until relatives can provide consent

Answer

Obtain consent from a magistrate

Question 4

A 13-year-old boy attends the surgery with a sore throat. Legally, what must a general practitioner do?

Accepted Answer

Examine and prescribe as appropriate

Answer

Refuse to see him unless a responsible adult is present

Answer

Write to the parent asking them to come to the surgery

Answer

Examine but not prescribe

Question 5

The doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur means?

Accepted Answer

The facts speak for themselves

Answer

Let the master answer

Answer

The things have been decided

Answer

Avoidable consequences

Question 6

Consent from guardian/husband for MTP is required in which of the following circumstances?

Accepted Answer

Female is below 17 years of age

Answer

Female is below 28 years of age

Answer

Female is below 23 years of age

Answer

Unmarried female

Question 7

Protecting an unqualified person in medical practice by a registered medical practitioner is known as which of the following?

Accepted Answer

Covering

Answer

Uncoverage

Answer

Touting

Answer

Dichotomy

Question 8

Under which circumstances can a doctor breach privileged communication?

Accepted Answer

Reporting a notifiable disease

Answer

Disclosing an HIV case to unauthorized persons

Answer

Discussing malignant conditions with the patient's family without consent

Answer

Testifying in a divorce case without a court order

Question 9

Under the Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994, which of the following is NOT a valid ground for carrying out a prenatal diagnostic test?

Accepted Answer

When fetal heart rate is 160 per minute at the fifth month and 120 per minute at the ninth month

Answer

Pregnant woman above 35 years of age

Answer

History of two or more spontaneous abortions or fetal losses

Answer

History of exposure to potentially teratogenic drugs

Question 10

Which of the following constitutes professional misconduct?

Accepted Answer

All of the above

Answer

Association with non-medical persons in medical procedures

Answer

Dichotomy

Answer

Issuing false certificate

Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine — MCQs

Legal and Ethical Aspects of Medicine — MCQs

On this page

Practice by Chapter

Want unlimited practice?