Maternal and Child Health — MCQs

Maternal and Child Health Indian Medical PG Practice Questions and MCQs

Question 481: In a community of 1,000,000 population, 105 children were born in a year, out of which 5 were stillbirths and 4 died within the first year of life. What is the Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)?

A. 40 (Correct Answer)
B. 90
C. 120
D. 150

Explanation: ***40*** - **Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)** = (Deaths in first year of life / Live births) × 1,000 - Live births = Total births - Stillbirths = 105 - 5 = **100** - IMR = (4 / 100) × 1,000 = **40 per 1,000 live births** - Stillbirths are excluded from both numerator and denominator as IMR only counts deaths after live birth *90* - This would result from incorrectly using total births (105) instead of live births (100) in the denominator - Wrong calculation: (4 / 105) × 1,000 ≈ 38, not 90 - This option represents a common error but with incorrect arithmetic *120* - This could result from including stillbirths in the numerator: (5+4) / 100 × 1,000 = 90, not 120 - Or from other miscalculations mixing up the numerator and denominator - Does not follow the standard IMR formula *150* - This represents a significant calculation error - May result from using wrong base (per 100 instead of per 1,000) or including stillbirths incorrectly - Such high IMR does not match the given data of 4 infant deaths per 100 live births

Question 482: What does the Gross Reproduction Rate (GRR) measure?

A. Number of female children a woman would have during her reproductive years, assuming no mortality (Correct Answer)
B. Number of total children a woman would have during her reproductive years (both male and female), assuming no mortality
C. Number of live births per 1000 women in a given year
D. Number of male children a woman would have during her reproductive years, assuming no mortality

Explanation: ***Number of female children a woman would have during her reproductive years, assuming no mortality*** - The **Gross Reproduction Rate (GRR)** specifically measures the average number of **daughters** a woman is expected to have over her lifetime. - It assumes no mortality among women through their reproductive years, indicating the potential for a new generation of mothers. *Number of total children a woman would have during her years of reproduction (both male and female), at the current age-specific fertility rates, assuming no mortality* - This definition describes the **Total Fertility Rate (TFR)**, which includes all live births (male and female) per woman. - While both GRR and TFR assume no mortality, the GRR is explicitly focused on the female offspring. *Number of live births per 1000 women in a given year* - This statement defines the **General Fertility Rate (GFR)**, which is a cross-sectional measure for a specific year. - GRR is a longitudinal measure that considers a woman's entire reproductive lifespan. *Number of male children a woman would have during her reproductive years, assuming no mortality* - The GRR is specifically interested in the **female offspring** as they are the ones who can potentially reproduce and replace the current generation of mothers. - Male offspring are not directly counted in the GRR calculation.

Question 483: Which of the following statements about ASHA is false?

A. One per 1000 rural population
B. Mobiliser of antenatal care
C. Female voluntary worker
D. Skilled birth attendant (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***Skilled birth attendant*** - ASHA workers are **community-level health facilitators** and **mobilizers**, but they are *not* trained or equipped to function as **skilled birth attendants**. - Their role during childbirth is primarily to **facilitate access to institutional delivery** and provide support, not to perform deliveries themselves. *One per 1000 rural population* - The norm for ASHA deployment is generally **one ASHA per 1000 population** in rural areas, reflecting their community-based role. - This ensures sufficient coverage for health promotion and basic health services within the community. *Mobiliser of antenatal care* - ASHA workers play a crucial role in **mobilizing pregnant women** for **antenatal care (ANC)** services, including encouraging regular check-ups and identifying high-risk pregnancies. - They are responsible for linking the community with the formal health system, promoting institutional deliveries, and advising on maternal health. *Female voluntary worker* - ASHA workers are **female residents** of the village they serve and are selected on a **voluntary basis**, contributing to the program's community-centric approach. - Their voluntary status means they receive an activity-based incentive rather than a fixed salary, emphasizing their role as community facilitators.

Question 484: According to the 2014 guidelines for female sterilization, which of the following is NOT an eligibility criterion for female sterilization?

A. Partner is not sterilized
B. Being unmarried
C. Should have at least 1 child (Correct Answer)
D. Age of at least 22 years

Explanation: ***Should have at least 1 child*** - The 2014 guidelines **removed the previous requirement** for a specific number of children, focusing instead on **informed consent** and **voluntary decision-making**. - The emphasis is now on the client's **autonomous choice**, regardless of their parity. - Having at least one child is **NOT an eligibility criterion** under the revised guidelines. *Age of at least 22 years* - While there is a minimum age requirement (legally 21 years, though some guidelines mention 22 years), this IS a valid eligibility criterion. - The age criterion ensures that individuals are mature enough to make an **informed and irreversible decision** about permanent contraception. - Younger individuals may be at higher risk of **regret** following sterilization. *Being unmarried* - Marital status is **NOT a barrier** to female sterilization under the 2014 guidelines. - Unmarried individuals have the same right to choose this method of contraception based on **informed consent**. - The decision for sterilization rests solely with the individual, irrespective of their **relationship status**. *Partner is not sterilized* - Partner's sterilization status is **NOT a determining factor** for female sterilization eligibility. - The decision is based on the **individual's choice**, health status, and desire for permanent contraception. - The eligibility criteria focus on the client's **informed consent** and understanding of the procedure, not on the partner's reproductive history.

Question 485: According to the ICDS scheme, what is the recommended population range for establishing one Anganwadi centre in rural areas?

A. 700-1000 (Urban)
B. 1000-1500 (Urban high density)
C. 300-800 (Hilly/Tribal areas)
D. 400-800 (Rural) (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***400-800 (Rural)*** - The **Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS)** scheme recommends one Anganwadi centre for a population of **400-800** in **rural areas**. - This is the **standard population norm** as per ICDS guidelines for establishing Anganwadi centres in typical rural settings. - This ensures adequate coverage and accessibility of ICDS services (nutrition, immunization, health check-ups, and preschool education) for mothers and children. *700-1000 (Urban)* - This population range (**700-1000**) is the standard norm for **urban areas**, not rural areas. - Urban areas have higher population density, hence a slightly larger population range is used per Anganwadi centre. - The question specifically asks about **rural areas**, making this option incorrect. *300-800 (Hilly/Tribal areas)* - This range (**300-800**) is designated for **hilly, difficult terrain, or specific tribal areas** where geographical challenges and scattered populations require lower population norms. - While this includes rural characteristics, it represents **special category areas**, not standard rural areas as asked in the question. *1000-1500 (Urban high density)* - A population target of **1000-1500** would be too high even for standard urban norms and doesn't align with official ICDS guidelines. - This is not applicable to **rural areas** as specified in the question.

Question 486: Which state has the lowest Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) in India?

A. Maharashtra
B. Tamil Nadu
C. Kerala (Correct Answer)
D. Uttar Pradesh

Explanation: ***Kerala*** - Kerala consistently has achieved the **lowest Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)** in India, demonstrating significant progress in public health and maternal-child care. - This is primarily attributed to its robust **healthcare infrastructure**, high literacy rates, and effective implementation of health programs. *Maharashtra* - While Maharashtra has made progress in reducing IMR, its rate remains **higher than Kerala's**, reflecting varying healthcare access and quality across the state. - There are regional disparities in health outcomes, despite significant economic development. *Tamil Nadu* - Tamil Nadu has a commendable healthcare system and has significantly reduced its IMR over the years, yet it **does not consistently achieve the lowest rate** when compared to Kerala. - Its focus on **universal healthcare access** and nutrition programs has been instrumental in its improvements. *Uttar Pradesh* - Uttar Pradesh typically reports one of the **highest Infant Mortality Rates (IMR)** in India, due to challenges such as limited access to healthcare, malnutrition, and poor sanitation. - Significant efforts are underway to improve maternal and child health indicators, but the state still lags behind the national average and other states like Kerala.

Question 487: Maternal mortality rate is defined as ?

A. Maternal death per 100,000 women
B. Maternal death per 100,000 total births
C. Maternal death per 100,000 live births (Correct Answer)
D. Maternal death per 100,000 women of reproductive age (15-49 years)

Explanation: ***Maternal death per 100,000 live births*** - This is the **standard WHO definition** of Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR), which is the most commonly used indicator - It measures the **obstetric risk** by relating maternal deaths to the number of live births - The MMR reflects the risk of death once a woman becomes pregnant - **India's MMR** (2018-20) was 97 per 100,000 live births *Maternal death per 100,000 women of reproductive age (15-49 years)* - This represents the **Maternal Mortality Rate** (not ratio), which is less commonly used - While technically a valid epidemiological measure, it is **not the standard definition** asked in most competitive exams - This would measure risk across the entire reproductive age population, not specifically related to pregnancies *Maternal death per 100,000 women* - Too broad and **non-specific**, as it includes women outside reproductive age - Does not account for the population actually at risk of maternal mortality - Not a recognized standard definition *Maternal death per 100,000 total births* - "Total births" is less precise than **"live births"** which is the standard denominator - Total births could potentially include stillbirths, making the definition ambiguous - The WHO specifically uses **live births** as the denominator

Question 488: In a town there are 2500 live births within six months. During the same period 5 women died due to peripartum infection, 5 died due to electrocution, 2 died due to obstructed labor and 3 died due to PPH. What is the MMR?

A. 6 per 1000 live births
B. 40 per 1000 live births
C. 60 per 1000 live births
D. 4 per 1000 live births (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***4 per 1000 live births*** - The **Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR)** is calculated as the number of maternal deaths per 100,000 live births. In this scenario, only deaths directly related to pregnancy or within 42 days postpartum from obstetric causes are considered maternal deaths. - Total maternal deaths = 5 (peripartum infection) + 2 (obstructed labor) + 3 (PPH) = 10. MMR = (10 maternal deaths / 2500 live births) * 1000 = 4. *6 per 1000 live births* - This calculation would incorrectly include deaths from non-obstetric causes, such as the 5 deaths due to electrocution, which are not considered maternal deaths. - Including non-maternal deaths inflates the ratio, leading to an inaccurate representation of obstetric risk. *40 per 1000 live births* - This value is significantly higher, suggesting a miscalculation in either the number of maternal deaths or the live births, potentially by using a multiplier of 100,000 live births instead of 1,000 for this question, or an arithmetic error. - A common error might be to multiply the total number of maternal deaths by 1000 and divide by the number of live births, leading to an incorrect large number if the base is not handled correctly. *60 per 1000 live births* - This result is far too high and indicates a significant overestimation of maternal deaths or a severe miscalculation. - It likely arises from a compounding of errors, possibly including non-maternal deaths and incorrect scaling of the denominator.

Question 489: Infant mortality rate in India is per 1000 live births?

A. 25
B. 55
C. 60
D. 34 (Correct Answer)

Explanation: ***34*** - As per the **Sample Registration System (SRS)** data around **2012-2013**, India's **Infant Mortality Rate (IMR)** was reported as **34 deaths per 1,000 live births**. - This represents the number of infant deaths (before completing one year of age) per 1,000 live births in a given year. - This was the approximate national average used for the NEET-2013 examination period. *25* - This figure represents a lower IMR than the national average for India during 2012-2013. - While some progressive states like Kerala had achieved IMR closer to this figure, it was not the overall national rate at that time. *55* - This figure is higher than the reported national IMR for India in 2012-2013. - India's IMR had already declined below this level due to improved maternal and child health programs under NRHM (National Rural Health Mission). *60* - This value represents a historical estimate from earlier years (pre-2010). - By 2012-2013, India had made significant progress in reducing infant mortality from these higher historical levels through better healthcare access and immunization coverage.

Question 490: What was the target reduction in child mortality rates set by the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) between 1990 and 2015?

A. Half
B. Two-thirds (Correct Answer)
C. One-fourth
D. One-third

Explanation: ***Two-thirds*** - The **Millennium Development Goal 4 (MDG 4)** specifically aimed to **reduce child mortality by two-thirds** among children under five years old between 1990 and 2015. - This target focused on improving maternal and child health outcomes globally. *Half* - Reducing child mortality by half was not the specific target set by MDG 4 for the 1990-2015 period. - While improvements were sought, the ambition was a more substantial reduction. *One-fourth* - A reduction of one-fourth would have been a significantly lower target than what was ultimately set and pursued by the MDGs. - The goals were designed to be ambitious yet achievable. *One-third* - Reducing child mortality by one-third falls short of the actual target established by the MDGs. - The international community aimed for a greater impact on child survival rates.

Practice by Chapter

Maternal Mortality: Causes and Prevention

Practice Questions

Antenatal Care

Practice Questions

Intranatal Care

Practice Questions

Postnatal Care

Practice Questions

High-Risk Pregnancy Management

Practice Questions

Infant Mortality: Causes and Prevention

Practice Questions

Under-Five Mortality

Practice Questions

Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness

Practice Questions

School Health Services

Practice Questions

Adolescent Health

Practice Questions

Reproductive and Child Health Programs

Practice Questions

International Maternal and Child Health Initiatives

Practice Questions

Want unlimited practice?

Get full access to all questions, explanations, and performance tracking.

Start For Free